![]() |
|||||||||||||||
News brief
|
|||||||||||||||
India's Endosulfan debateFollowing the controversy over Bt cotton, Indian agriculture is currently embroiled in another dispute, this time over the pesticide Endosulfan. A report in the Centre for Science and Environment's monthly journal, 'Down to Earth' has linked the unusually high incidence of deformities and disease in a village in Kerala, with the organochlorine pesticide. Endosulfan has been used in Kerala's cashew plantations for more than twenty years, despite being banned or restricted in many countries. Samples collected in the study found residues to be very high, and concern about the possible poisoning has prompted government action at national and state level. In Kerala the government has banned aerial spraying of the pesticide. However, this has prompted the Indian pesticide industry to commission its own study, which has cleared Endosulfan of the poisoning charge. As a result, the industry has threatened anti-Endosulfan campaigners with legal action. India is the world's largest producer of the pesticide, which is used in many areas of the country. If harmful effects could be proved, the industry could face an expensive series of health related claims. With neither side ready to concede, the issue is set to dominate Indian agriculture for the rest of the season. Agriculture at WSSDOne of the many side events at the Summit included the presentation by the UK Secretary of State for International Development, Clare Short, of the DFID issues paper, Better livelihoods for poor people: The role of Agriculture. This 30-page document demonstrates that there is a case for taking specific interest in agriculture as part of the agenda to tackle poverty. It also accepts that whereas much could be done to improve agriculture in developing countries, many of the global distortions in agriculture emanate from domestic policy in developed countries. The report is available in pdf format on the DFID website at www.dfid.gov.uk. Rabbit control? Inconceivable!A genetically modified strain of the myxoma virus developed by an Australian research team could represent a solution to the country's rabbit pest problem. The immunocontraceptive virus, which once introduced into wild rabbits would quickly spread through the population, gives the rabbits a mild fever for a few days, but also has a sterilising action on females. Potentially it could help to prevent the hugely destructive rabbit plagues that each year cause hundreds of millions of dollars worth of damage to agricultural production and the environment. In two trials in May this year, the virus was found to sterilise eight out of eleven females; if such a success rate could be achieved in the wild, rabbit densities could be reduced to the much less damaging levels found in Europe. However, releasing a genetically modified virus into the wild would be controversial. While the chance of it transferring to non-target species is thought to be low - no greater than for a normal myxoma virus, which has not affected other mammals during its fifty years in Australia - it would be easy for the virus to spread to other continents, either accidentally or with human assistance. The researchers, who work at the Pest Animal Control Cooperative Research Centre in Canberra, are seeking permission for field trials of another virus, used to sterilise mice. (see Reproductive restraint revealed in mice) In laboratory trials the virus has proved to have a 100% sterilising effect on female mice; the application for the field trials will be made later this year. Further research is focussing on immunocontraceptive viruses to control predator populations, such as foxes in Australia and stoats in New Zealand. |