Perspective
How can agriculture face the challenges posed by HIV/AIDS?
The devastating impact of HIV/AIDS on agriculture has been known for some time.
For many, it is well known that the disease has decimated sub-Saharan
Africa's agricultural labour force and will continue to do so for generations,
depleting the region of its food producers and farmers. HIV reduces the
productive capacity of the rural poor, limits their ability to buy agricultural
inputs and generates a spiral of acute poverty. The loss of labour reduces
the time spent on maintaining agricultural infrastructure such as terraces
and irrigation systems and so hinders the medium and long term sustainability
of agriculture.
At the earlier stages of the epidemic HIV/AIDS was predominantly an urban problem,
affecting more men than women and those with relatively high incomes.
Now the epidemic is rapidly moving into the rural areas, hitting those
who are least well equipped to deal with its consequences. Today, those
who are most HIV infected are the rural, the women and the poor.
In spite of its devastating effects on agricultural production and rural livelihoods,
and in spite of the fact that up to 80% of the people in the most affected
countries depend on agriculture for their subsistence, most of the response
to the epidemic has come from the health sector. The agriculture sector
has either remained silent or has adopted similar health-sector initiatives
to counter the effects of the epidemic. Often Ministry of Agriculture
staff have taken up functions that should be performed by their Ministry
of Health counterparts, neglecting their own duties to ill perform others
that they are not qualified to carry out.
It is unrealistic to expect that drugs will provide the solution to AIDS in
rural Africa. In spite of the fact that there is a cheap, one-dose treatment
for malaria, every year, more than 2 million people die from this disease.
AIDS drugs are expensive, need to be taken in specific combinations in
order not to generate resistance, need close medical monitoring, need
an adequately nourished body and need, at the very least, to be taken
with clean water. All of these conditions are far removed from the reality
in rural Africa.
Effective solutions for rural areas rely on the agricultural sector and
its capacity to reduce people's vulnerability to acquire the disease.
The agricultural sector is in a strong position to assist in both the
prevention and mitigation of the consequences of HIV/AIDS. Moreover, it
has a responsibility to those people who depend on agriculture for subsistence.
What can the agricultural sector do?
An effective agriculture strategy has to respond to the implications
of a dramatic loss of labour and loss of productive generations. It should
develop appropriate labour-saving technologies such as: low-input agriculture;
lighter ploughs and tools that can be used by older children, women and
the elderly; improved seed varieties that require less labour for weeding;
intercropping and minimum tillage. Attention must be paid to improving
the nutrition of those affected by HIV/AIDS. Possible strategies could
include: nutritional home gardens; use of improved crop management and
plant varieties with higher yields; use of small ruminants for consumption,
sale and manure; education and labour exchange requirements. Strategies
must ensure that basic agriculture skills are transmitted to orphans and
to the young generation and that local knowledge, including biodiversity
and gender-specific skills are preserved. Ensuring food security, which
will reduce widows and orphans' need to engage in survival sex to acquire
food, will contribute to prevention of the spread of the disease.
Efforts must be made to reduce gender-based differences in access to
and control of resources and livelihood assets - in particular access
to land, credit, employment, education and information.
All of these strategies require the agriculture sector to be more creative
in the delivery of services; to work multi-sectorally with other stakeholders
and to provide a co-ordinated response. It necessitates a decentralised
process in which the local capacity of rural institutions are strengthened
and local safety nets supported to promote community-based initiatives.
It needs to put people at the centre of policy.
How will agriculture have to adapt itself to the conditions created
by HIV/AIDS?
The agriculture sector cannot continue with "business as usual"
in communities where vast numbers of adults are dead, leaving only the
elderly and children. The agriculture sector will have to revise the content
and delivery of its services, the process of transferring agricultural
knowledge which is essential to development, to farming communities. It
will be necessary to develop appropriate technologies and to integrate
indigenous knowledge. The challenge is to be able to deliver a responsive
service when agriculture institutions are also suffering from acute staff
shortages and the associated cost due to increasing HIV/AIDS mortality
and morbidity. Agricultural research institutions can play an instrumental
role in the mitigation of the consequences of the disease. Research is
needed on new crop varieties that require less labour and inputs while
at the same time providing the specific nutrients needed by persons living
with HIV/AIDS. Seeds that can be planted at different times of year will
allow farmers more flexibility to manage periods of acute labour shortage.
Techniques or varieties that reduce weeding time can liberate women's
labour.
Agricultural policy will have to become more responsible to HIV/AIDS
concerns. Policies can contribute detrimentally to the epidemic, by increasing
migratory patterns, for example, which are closely associated with the
spread of HIV. Policy can also contribute to mitigating the consequences
of the disease. By ensuring adequate markets and production opportunities
and prices, farmers may avoid the need to migrate in search of other income
sources.
The spread of AIDS is intrinsically related to development and food insecurity
in rural Africa. Agriculture is an engine of rural development and can
be effective in supporting people's livelihoods and in turn in preventing
and mitigating the impacts of HIV/AIDS. The agricultural sector must seize
this opportunity to redirect its priorities and to devote adequate funding
to avoid the loss of the lives of the people it is intended to serve.
Back to top
|