text size: smaller reset larger

 

 

Raymond Austrie

Raymond Austrie, General Manager of Dominica Banana Producers Limited, reflects on the impacts EU reforms and trade rules have on small farmers
Raymond Austrie, General Manager of Dominica Banana Producers Limited, reflects on the impacts EU reforms and trade rules have on small farmers

Free trade or fair trade?

Raymond Austrie is General Manager of Dominica Banana Producers Limited - the producer company responsible for supporting the island's 900 growers and exporting their bananas to the UK. Like all the banana-reliant economies of the Windward Islands of the Caribbean, Dominica faces an uncertain future as the European Union, responding to pressure from the World Trade Organisation, opens more of its markets to bananas produced on a large scale in Latin America.

Caribbean bananas hang in the balance

Bananas are still an important part of rural life and economic stability in Dominica, providing our main source of foreign exchange in the agricultural sector. In the immediate term for us there's no alternative to bananas. We have 900 full time banana farmers and their businesses employ another 6000 more. The fruits of their labour - 17,000 tonnes of bananas exported to the UK a year - bring to this island East Caribbean US$20 million most of which (90 per cent) goes into producers' pockets.

The main threat to us now is market instability. Our exports to the UK used to be considerably higher but, as a result of European Union reforms, our market share has been falling. We believe that any change in the current system - where we have a guaranteed place in the market - will lead to a price war. Small farmers everywhere are the ones to suffer when free trade rules. If any instability occurs, such as a drop in prices, the buyers - the supermarkets - will not make up for it. Instead, it is always passed on to the producers resulting in lower and lower returns.

One economic theory does not fit all

Economic theories on world trade are mainly developed for developed economies. When you apply rich-based theories to young economies such as ours it's like saying you want a man to compete with a baby! It's nonsensical. To take trade rules designed for an advanced economy and apply them to countries whose economies are in their infancy is illogical and irrational. This is why the world needs to make concessions for economies of developing countries, under the Cotonou Agreement, to provide opportunities to generate export revenue which can finance their development, and so that we can participate fairly and properly in world trade. The right of small countries to participate fairly in the world economy - that's the issue at stake.

Despite our limitations, we've been doing our best to produce high quality bananas. Our buyers inform us that our quality is as good as the competition. However, in terms of productivity, there's no way to keep up with the multinationals in Latin America, even though their high yields are often achieved at a very high social and environmental cost, which is not factored into their costs of production.

However, we have made progress in reducing costs. By collaborating with our sister Windward Island countries, we are lowering investment in inputs by procuring goods, including fertilisers and packaging materials, in bulk. But these measures will still not put us on an equal footing because those well-endowed with technology have the power and influence.

Equal rights to markets

The challenge to the WTO and the EU is to find mechanisms in trade rules to ensure market access for all. The big, Latin American banana companies are arguing for total market access. Small countries have the same rights: to participate fairly and properly in world trade.

Failure to find a way to trade fairly will have a calamitous effect on small countries like ours. History tells us so. It's not a question of theory, it's a question of evidence. It will result in instability. In practical terms, instability means that youth unemployment, currently running at 50 per cent, will increase. It means the number of people of living in poverty - now 30 per cent - will rise. It means the ability of government to finance development will reduce considerably.

The writing is on the wall. Do we want to proceed with this liberalised world economy despite the impact on developing countries? In 2005 a meeting held in Brussels with representatives of the banana industry - large and small - called for a proper evaluation of the previous impact of changes in the banana trading regime. That's the sensible way to proceed. It would be a win:win situation. We would all benefit, multinationals and small produces alike. Why then accept a situation when the only winners will be the supermarket conglomerates in Europe - because they will pay less for bananas - while everyone else loses.

We need managed trade. Not just free-wheeling trade that destroys everything in its path. If you go in the sea and destroy all the small fish in the sea, we know what will happen. If you go to the forest and destroy all the small trees and plants, we know what will happen. Globalisation means we are in this world together. What happens here in Dominica will affect other economies, even in the US and Europe. For example, we import EC$40 million worth of goods a year from the USA. If we have instability, we will not be importing and that will affect businesses and jobs in the countries we buy from.

We live in an interdependent world where big and small should learn to live and prosper together.

Date published: March 2006

 

Have your say

 

The New Agriculturist is a WRENmedia production.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Read more